[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: _Atomic
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: _Atomic |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Oct 2020 23:47:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-189-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) |
Paul Eggert wrote:
> Oh, I was thinking the other way: a compiler that says it's C11 but doesn't
> support _Atomic.
I haven't found such a compiler in my testing [1]. If one appears, we can add
an ad-hoc test or an Autoconf test.
Bruno
[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2020-10/msg00068.html
- Re: Draft #3 (with iterators), (continued)
- Re: Draft #3 (with iterators), Bruno Haible, 2020/10/11
- Re: Non-opaque hamt type?, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen, 2020/10/12
- Re: Non-opaque hamt type?, Bruno Haible, 2020/10/18
- Re: Non-opaque hamt type?, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen, 2020/10/18
- Re: Non-opaque hamt type?, Bruno Haible, 2020/10/18
- Re: Non-opaque hamt type?, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen, 2020/10/18
- Re: terminology, Bruno Haible, 2020/10/11
- Re: terminology, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen, 2020/10/11
- Re: _Atomic, Bruno Haible, 2020/10/10
- Re: _Atomic, Paul Eggert, 2020/10/11
- Re: _Atomic,
Bruno Haible <=