[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: recursion limit of 1024 exceeded
From: |
Dagobert Michelsen |
Subject: |
Re: recursion limit of 1024 exceeded |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Dec 2020 20:40:52 +0100 |
Hi Paul,
Am 12.12.2020 um 20:29 schrieb Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>:
> On 12/12/20 4:13 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
>> m4 should be current, meanwhile I tried to update autoconf to 2.70 with
>> 3 unexpected failures and automake to 14 unexpected failures which I will
>> report on the respective mailing lists.
>> Do you think the error could be from outdated versions of these two?
>
> It's possible, since I just installed some patches into Gnulib related to
> Autoconf 2.70. I did test those patches with Autoconf 2.69 too (as patched
> for Fedora 33), so if the problem is Autoconf related, most likely it's a
> problem fixed in the Fedora patches for Autoconf 2.69 which means you would
> be better off with Autoconf 2.70.
>
> Despite my fondness and nostalgia for Solaris, I don't bother with testing
> gnulib-tool on Solaris 10 because Solaris 10 ships with GNU m4 1.4.2,
> Autoconf 2.59, and Automake 1.8.3, and so it's no longer a suitable porting
> target for Gnulib development. That is, although you can build from
> Gnulib-based tarballs on Solaris 10, you can't build from Git development
> trees (Solaris 10 doesn't even have Git) without doing a lot of work and it's
> not worth the effort to me. Instead, I suggest running './gnulib-tool
> --create-testdir --dir FOO ...' on a more up-to-date platform, copying FOO to
> Solaris 10, and then testing just './configure && make' on the copy of FOO on
> Solaris 10.
I see, would that also count as viable solution for Gnulib CI on Solaris? I
have other,
more recent systems around to use on the CI system of that would help.
Best regards
— Dago
--
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to
do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896