Re: posixtm failure on Solaris

[Bruno Haible]

Paul Eggert wrote:
> > Since, as you said, it's not worth worrying about,
> > I would guess that there is no need to update the documentation?
> 
> Yes, the posixtm bug's not worth worrying about. However the underlying 
> localtime issue might be worth a mention.

Nice. I would not have know what to write here.

> MacOS X 10.5, Solaris 11.3.

Ah indeed, I still get the test failure on Mac OS X 10.5. Need to silence
it for this platform as well:


2021-01-01  Bruno Haible  <bruno@clisp.org>

        posixtm tests: Disable part of the test on plaforms where it fails.
        * tests/test-posixtm.c (T): Disable two tests on macOS as well.

diff --git a/tests/test-posixtm.c b/tests/test-posixtm.c
index 0d55608..ea20564 100644
--- a/tests/test-posixtm.c
+++ b/tests/test-posixtm.c
@@ -46,10 +46,10 @@ static struct posixtm_test const T[] =
     { "12131415.16",     LY, 1,            0}, /* ??? Dec 13 14:15:16 ???? */
     { "12131415",        LY, 1,            0}, /* ??? Dec 13 14:15:00 ???? */
 
-#if !defined __sun
-    /* These two tests fail on 64-bit Solaris up through at least
-       Solaris 11.3, which is off by one day for timestamps before
-       0001-01-01 00:00:00 UTC.  */
+#if !((defined __APPLE__ && defined __MACH__) || defined __sun)
+    /* These two tests fail on 64-bit Mac OS X 10.5 and on 64-bit Solaris up
+       through at least Solaris 11.3, which is off by one day for timestamps
+       before 0001-01-01 00:00:00 UTC.  */
     { "000001010000.00", LY, 1,
                       - INT64_C (62167219200)},/* Sat Jan  1 00:00:00 0    */
     { "000012312359.59", LY, 1,