0001-verify-rely-more-on-__cpp_static_assert.patchDescription: Text Data
|
| From: | Paul Eggert |
| Subject: | Re: clang++ 11 compilation issues |
| Date: | Wed, 13 Jan 2021 16:37:58 -0800 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0 |
On 1/12/21 12:19 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
Those macros check for __cpp_static_assert to assume something about _Static_assert, which seems dubious.Paul can tell more about this one.
I agree it's dubious.Also, looking over the current verify.h, it's a little complicated and I doubt whether the complexity is worth it nowadays. How about if we simplify the C++ case, by simply relying on __cpp_static_assert there? Although this could miss opportunities for generating diagnostics via older C++ compilers, I doubt whether they're worth the trouble any more.
Proposed Gnulib patch attached (I haven't installed it).
0001-verify-rely-more-on-__cpp_static_assert.patch
Description: Text Data
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |