Re: ptrdiff_t overflow checks for malloc-posix etc.

[Paul Eggert]

On 4/18/21 5:04 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Paul Eggert wrote:
> > I installed the attached instead, as this is simpler.

And I'm already starting to wonder whether testing for ptrdiff_t 
overflow was such a good idea. I installed the attached further patch to 
try to pacify GCC diagnostics about them.

If these ptrdiff_t tests turn out to be too much trouble we can always 
withdraw them.

0001-malloc-gnu-tests-pacify-Walloc-size-larger-than.patch
Description: Text Data