|
From: | Paul Eggert |
Subject: | Re: test suite failure caused by check-copyright script |
Date: | Sun, 23 May 2021 18:51:56 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 |
On 5/23/21 4:19 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
Does everyone still agree - to put into the source files a license header that is consistent with the module description, and - to remove the statement from the documentation "The source files always say "GPL", but the real license specification is in the module description file." ?
Yes, that still sounds reasonable.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |