[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] base32, base64: prefer signed to unsigned integers
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] base32, base64: prefer signed to unsigned integers |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Aug 2021 14:45:26 +0200 |
Hi Paul,
There are two problems with this patch:
1) $ ./gnulib-tool --create-testdir --dir=../testdir5 --single-configure base32
base64
prints messages
gnulib-tool: warning: module base32 depends on a module with an incompatible
license: ialloc
gnulib-tool: warning: module base64 depends on a module with an incompatible
license: ialloc
The obvious fix would be to change the license of 'ialloc' from LGPL to
LGPLv2+.
2) The continuous integration reported a test failure (both with GCC and clang):
test-base64.c:131: assertion 'len == 0' failed
FAIL test-base64 (exit status: 134)
But, strangely, I can't reproduce it locally. (Maybe it depends on the glibc
version?)
Bruno
- [PATCH] base32, base64: prefer signed to unsigned integers, Paul Eggert, 2021/08/27
- Re: [PATCH] base32, base64: prefer signed to unsigned integers,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: [PATCH] base32, base64: prefer signed to unsigned integers, Bruno Haible, 2021/08/28
- Re: [PATCH] base32, base64: prefer signed to unsigned integers, Paul Eggert, 2021/08/29
- Re: [PATCH] base32, base64: prefer signed to unsigned integers, Bruno Haible, 2021/08/29
- Re: [PATCH] base32, base64: prefer signed to unsigned integers, Paul Eggert, 2021/08/29
- Re: [PATCH] base32, base64: prefer signed to unsigned integers, Bruno Haible, 2021/08/29
- Re: [PATCH] base32, base64: prefer signed to unsigned integers, Paul Eggert, 2021/08/29
Re: [PATCH] base32, base64: prefer signed to unsigned integers, Paul Eggert, 2021/08/29
Re: [PATCH] base32, base64: prefer signed to unsigned integers, Simon Josefsson, 2021/08/29