|
From: | Paul Eggert |
Subject: | Re: uninorm/composition.c:75:22: runtime error |
Date: | Sat, 5 Mar 2022 13:18:10 -0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 |
On 3/4/22 05:58, Simon Josefsson via Gnulib discussion list wrote:
Below that is a patch for another UBSAN complaint about a NULL + 0 operation -- I recall that being discussed before too, but don't recall the conclusion.
(char *)0 + 0 is undefined behavior, so clang's complaint about it is more justifiable than its complaint about assigning an unsigned char value to a char. But even with (char *)0 + 0 my feeling was that Clang is wrong, as adding 0 to (char *)0 works just fine on all platforms of practical interest; so we're better off overall by asking people to use -fno-sanitize=pointer-overflow when compiling Gnulib, if they also compile with -fsanitize=undefined. See the thread starting here:
https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-gnulib/2021-10/msg00053.html and ending here: https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-gnulib/2022-02/msg00049.html
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |