Re: bug#57129: 29.0.50; Improve behavior of conditionals in Eshell

[Paul Eggert]

On 8/16/22 12:59, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Since this contradicts what you debugged on mingw, I ran the test 10000
> times on native Windows. Result:
>    - on 32-bit mingw, no failure.
>    - on 64-bit mingw, around 30 failures (or around 10 failures with Paul's
>      newest patch). That is, a probability of ca. 0.3% of getting the same
>      file name as on the previous call.

That's odd, for two reasons. First, 64-bit and 32-bit mingw shouldn't 
differ, as they both use uint_fast64_t which should be the same width on 
both platforms. Second, I could not reproduce the problem on 64-bit 
Ubuntu x86-64 (after altering tempname.c to always define 
HAS_CLOCK_ENTROPY to false) test-tempname always succeeded in 10000 tries.

Could you investigate further why mingw 64-bit fails?