[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Follow up to last post

From: Po Lu
Subject: Re: Follow up to last post
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 08:44:54 +0800
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)

Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> writes:

> On 1/18/23 05:53, Po Lu wrote:
>> +  gl_CHECK_FUNCS_ANDROID([utimensat], [[#include <sys/stat.h>]])
>>     if test $ac_cv_func_utimensat = no; then
> REPLACE_UTIMENSAT=1 means utimensat is present but broken and needs to
> be replaced. However, $ac_cv_func_utimensat = no means utimensat is
> absent. So I'm puzzled as to why REPLACE_UTIMENSAT=1 would be
> appropriate here.

The problem is that utimensat *is* in the C library on the newer Android
systems, so when the binary runs on those, gnulib ends up replacing the
C library utimensat, with potentially horrid consequences.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]