[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fts: Document this module
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: fts: Document this module |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Jan 2023 00:41:47 +0100 |
> The gnulib fts is different from glibc API, and they can return
> different results when called the same way. See end of earlier thread
> here:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2021-07/msg00070.html
Thanks for the heads-up, Simon.
> I'm not sure what could be done. Perhaps adding a sentence to the
> gnulib documentation stating that the gnulib fts is not a drop-in
> replacement for missing fts functionality but a separate implementation
> with different behaviour.
I'm not sure about what to write either. Jim or Paul, what should we state
— either in the 'fts' module description, or in the .texi documentation?
Bruno