Re: fts: Document this module

[Paul Eggert]

On 1/19/23 15:41, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Jim or Paul, what should we state
> — either in the 'fts' module description, or in the .texi documentation?

The quick thing is to say in both that the description/documentation is 
incomplete, and that people need to read the source code.

Jim may be able to fill in a bit here, since I think he wrote most of 
that stuff. (I haven't checked this though; sorry, I'm a bit crunched 
for time today.)