[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch to gnustep-base (Unicode and others)
From: |
Serg Stoyan |
Subject: |
Re: patch to gnustep-base (Unicode and others) |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Apr 2002 22:15:42 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.16i |
Hello, Richard Frith-Macdonald.
RFM> > RFM> OK ... guess I was wrong about that ... it *does* seem to say
RFM> > strings
RFM> > RFM> should be converted to unicode ... but that's incorrect/misleading
RFM> > RFM> documentation.
RFM> >
RFM> > What documentation do you reccomend me to use? Apple's FoundationKit
RFM> > and AppKit frameworks documentation? It says the same. What else?
RFM> > Maybe i misunderstand you at some point?
RFM>
RFM> I don't think so ... I'm just saying that the wording in the
RFM> documentation on
RFM> this point is poor ... and is misleading/wrong. That doesn't mean to
RFM> imply
RFM> that there is another better set of documentation anywhere.
RFM> When you read the documentation in depth, and look at what the various
RFM> implementations actually do, you can tell what they intended to say.
Ok, it's clear to me now.
RFM> > RFM> Thanks, I've added them (I converted to ascii with \u escapes for
RFM> > RFM> consistency with the other files, but that should make no
RFM> > difference).
RFM> >
RFM> > By the way, you probably forgot to upload these files to CVS.
RFM>
RFM> Yes, sorry, they are definately comitted now.
Works nice now. Thank you.
--
Serg Stoyan
Растения полезны - выделяют кислород, жизненно необходимый автомобилям.