Re: autogsdoc, once more

[Richard Frith-Macdonald]

On Monday, May 5, 2003, at 05:34  pm, Chris B. Vetter wrote:

> Hi,
>
> there is a "bug" in autogsdoc when you have the following scenario:
>
>   // "Forward" declaration
>
>   @protocol     Foo, Bar;

>  autogsdoc will dump
>
>   Protocols.h:85 (Foo): interface with bogus line ... we expect methods
>   Protocols.h:129 (Foo): @method list with unknown directive 'protocol'
>
> and screw up the protocol description for the first (here Foo) 
> protocol.

It didn't understand difference between protocol definitions and 
forward declarations ... I've fixed the
CVS code to ignore the forward declarations.