Re: [patch #1757] [Patch #1757] Allow build of gdl2 on MacOSX (kinda clunky)

[David Ayers]

Ok, now I've got it...

- I'll have a look into removing the dependancy of GNUstep specific 
environment variables.
- Even though the FlatFileAdaptor and LDAPAdaptor have a very permisive 
license, I don't think it's apropriate to make them part of the gdl2 
repository.  Maybe we should have a "non-gnu" adaptor repository 
somewhere and point to it from gdl2 documentation (maybe a  README 
within our Adaptor directory).
- NSFault / NSFaultHandler ... OK, the WWDC hasn't revealed a new EOF.  
I must say I'm a bit relieved, in light of potentially requiering a GDL3 
for compatibility.  I still think that we shouldn't try to use classes 
we know so little about, but the patches are a *lot* less intrusive now 
(thanks a lot!), so I'm not as worried as before.  I'll leave this issue 
for the maintainer to decide.
- We could create the macosx directory.  Yet the binary files 
gdl2/macosx/English.lproj/InfoPlist.strings (unicode I presume) will 
have to be submitted seprately as the patch doesn't contain them.  Were 
the <user>.pbxuser files intended to be part of the patch?
- I'll also look into the other patches to the PostgresAdaptor, 
EOClassDescription and EOObeserver.

Anyway, we'll need a copyright assignment in place for it.  But I think 
we already have one, don't we? ;-)

Cheers,
David