[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug #6342] threads broken on Solaris 2.6
|
From: |
nobody |
|
Subject: |
[bug #6342] threads broken on Solaris 2.6 |
|
Date: |
Thu, 06 Nov 2003 12:14:45 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0) |
=================== BUG #6342: LATEST MODIFICATIONS ==================
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=6342&group_id=99
Changes by: Adam Fedor <fedor@gnu.org>
Date: Thu 11/06/2003 at 10:14 (US/Mountain)
What | Removed | Added
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity | 5 - Major | 3
Assigned to | None | fedor
Status | Open | Analyzed
------------------ Additional Follow-up Comments ----------------------------
Just a quick check found that the default Solaris thread scope (PROCESS SCOPE)
doesn't work, so changing this in libobjc fixes it. SYSTEM SCOPE is probably
better anyway, but I'm wondering if we should do this in general or just for
Solaris. What's the default on other systems? Any other comments?
------------------ Additional Bug Attachment ----------------------------
File name: thread.patch Size:0 KB
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/download.php?group_id=99&bug_id=6342&bug_file_id=798
=================== BUG #6342: FULL BUG SNAPSHOT ===================
Submitted by: rmottola Project: GNUstep
Submitted on: Mon 11/03/2003 at 10:06
Category: Base/Foundation Severity: 3
Bug Group: Bug Resolution: None
Assigned to: fedor Status: Analyzed
Summary: threads broken on Solaris 2.6
Original Submission: Threads seem broken on Solaris 2.6. Typical appearance is
that threads don't detach. But launching some tests (for example thread
exception test) don't produce any result (but no error either).
Configure reports thread presence and enables the -lpthread flag. Looking at
configure.log I see no evident problem.
Follow-up Comments
*******************
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu 11/06/2003 at 10:14 By: fedor
Just a quick check found that the default Solaris thread scope (PROCESS SCOPE)
doesn't work, so changing this in libobjc fixes it. SYSTEM SCOPE is probably
better anyway, but I'm wondering if we should do this in general or just for
Solaris. What's the default on other systems? Any other comments?
CC list is empty
File Attachments
****************
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu 11/06/2003 at 10:14 Name: thread.patch Size: 0KB By: fedor
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/download.php?group_id=99&bug_id=6342&bug_file_id=798
For detailed info, follow this link:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=6342&group_id=99
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/