bug-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC/make] Extend Framework support II


From: David Ayers
Subject: Re: [RFC/make] Extend Framework support II
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 15:18:33 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

Nicola Pero wrote:

Ok - so you want to install all your stuff, including frameworks, into
GNUstep directories outside of the Apple ones.

I don't think it's a good way of doing things, but I also agree it's a
reasonable request for a power user to be able to use gnustep-make in such
a way if you so wish, and the current code doesn't allow you to do it.

So, send me the patches to add -F and YDLIB_XXX on Apple and I'll commit
them. :-)

I'd still like to preserve the defaults for it to be to use it only as a
build system, so maybe the -F and DYLIB_XXX code should be turned on only
by a configure flag.  I'm not sure yet, but you'll have the possibility of
installing frameworks in gnustep-make's installation directory if you feel
that's what you need, and I'm sure a ./configure flag won't scare you that
much.

Thanks.  Useful discussion it seems :-)

Thank you :-) !

Now for consistencies sake, if -make doesn't add -F/DYLD_FRAMEWORK_NAME, should I also remove -I/-L/DYLD_LIBRARY_NAME wrt to the "GNUstep Installation" when this configure flag isn't set? I would think so. There seems no sense in searching for headers and libraries and then ignoring frameworks.

Cheers,
David

PS: The patches will probably not be ready until Monday as this weekend is pretty packed.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]