bug-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bugs #9850] -getIndexes:maxCount:inIndexRange: (NSIndexSet) won't accep


From: Richard Frith-Macdonald
Subject: [bugs #9850] -getIndexes:maxCount:inIndexRange: (NSIndexSet) won't accept null NSRangePointer
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:32:53 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/125.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/125.9

This mail is an automated notification from the bugs tracker
 of the project: GNUstep.

/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #9850] Latest Modifications:

Changes by: 
                Richard Frith-Macdonald <rfm@gnu.org>
'Date: 
                Tue 08/24/2004 at 05:20 (GMT)

            What     | Removed                   | Added
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Resolution | None                      | Fixed
              Status | Open                      | Closed


------------------ Additional Follow-up Comments ----------------------------
Fixed in CVS .. thanks.






/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #9850] Full Item Snapshot:

URL: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=9850>
Project: GNUstep
Submitted by: Yen-Ju Chen
On: Mon 08/02/2004 at 17:55

Category:  Base/Foundation
Severity:  5 - Average
Item Group:  Change Request
Resolution:  Fixed
Privacy:  Public
Assigned to:  None
Status:  Closed


Summary:  -getIndexes:maxCount:inIndexRange: (NSIndexSet) won't accept null 
NSRangePointer

Original Submission:  In Cocoa, NSIndexSet accept NULL pointer for 
NSRangePointer in -getIndexes:maxCount:inIndexRange: and get the indexes from 
all range.
In GNUstep, a NSException is raised.
Though the Cocoa document doesn't say about NULL NSRangePointer,
I think it is more convenient to use NULL to get indexes from all range.
Otherwise, indexRange has to be calculated every time in order to get all 
indexes, 
which is kind of troublesome.

Follow-up Comments
------------------


-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue 08/24/2004 at 05:20       By: Richard Frith-Macdonald <CaS>
Fixed in CVS .. thanks.












For detailed info, follow this link:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=9850>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]