[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug #15353] win32 compilation of base fails on NSProcessInfo.m (che
From: |
David Ayers |
Subject: |
Re: [bug #15353] win32 compilation of base fails on NSProcessInfo.m (checked out from CVS today) |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Jan 2006 15:03:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20051002) |
Sheldon Gill schrieb:
> I'm not sure what Richard was about really with this patch but it seems
> intended to allow callers to change the environment.
>
> Not sure its a good idea and very uncertain about the method.
>
> That aside, moving the declaration of "fallbackInitialisation" will fix
> the compilation error as the variable is now declared.
>
> The compiled base does work. I compiled -gui, -back and Gorm afterwards
> which worked okay.
>
> Stefan's reported error regarding back not being found is related to
> path discovery. Its some interaction issue in his current setup. That'd
> be the NSPath changes of late which is a whole other issue.
>
Hello Sheldon,
Thanks a lot for investigating. As I've already moved the declaration
in CVS, I think we should leave things as they are for now until Richard
returns and I'll let you Windows developers figure it out with him and
Stefan.
Cheers,
David
- [bug #15353] win32 compilation of base fails on NSProcessInfo.m (checked out from CVS today), Stefan van den Oord, 2006/01/02
- [bug #15353] win32 compilation of base fails on NSProcessInfo.m (checked out from CVS today), Stefan van den Oord, 2006/01/04
- [bug #15353] win32 compilation of base fails on NSProcessInfo.m (checked out from CVS today), David Ayers, 2006/01/04
- [bug #15353] win32 compilation of base fails on NSProcessInfo.m (checked out from CVS today), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2006/01/08
- Re: [bug #15353] win32 compilation of base fails on NSProcessInfo.m (checked out from CVS today), Sheldon Gill, 2006/01/09
- Re: [bug #15353] win32 compilation of base fails on NSProcessInfo.m (checked out from CVS today), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2006/01/09
- Re: [bug #15353] win32 compilation of base fails on NSProcessInfo.m (checked out from CVS today), Sheldon Gill, 2006/01/09
- Re: [bug #15353] win32 compilation of base fails on NSProcessInfo.m (checked out from CVS today), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2006/01/09
- Re: [bug #15353] win32 compilation of base fails on NSProcessInfo.m (checked out from CVS today), Sheldon Gill, 2006/01/09