[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug #59031] the \[Im] and \[Re] escapes are wrong
From: |
Ingo Schwarze |
Subject: |
[bug #59031] the \[Im] and \[Re] escapes are wrong |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Aug 2020 07:20:51 -0400 (EDT) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; OpenBSD amd64; rv:77.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/77.0 |
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #59031 (project groff):
This report appears to be invalid.
\(Re and \(Im represent the functions "real part" and "imaginary part". Both
functions are surjective, but not injective funtions taking a complex argument
and delivering a real result. \(Re is also idempotent, but \(Im is not.
I don't think there is anything wrong with the current situation.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?59031>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
- [bug #59031] the \[Im] and \[Re] escapes are wrong, G. Branden Robinson, 2020/08/28
- [bug #59031] the \[Im] and \[Re] escapes are wrong,
Ingo Schwarze <=
- [bug #59031] the \[Im] and \[Re] escapes are wrong, G. Branden Robinson, 2020/08/28
- [bug #59031] the \[Im] and \[Re] escapes are wrong, G. Branden Robinson, 2020/08/28
- [bug #59031] the \[Im] and \[Re] escapes are wrong, G. Branden Robinson, 2020/08/28
- [bug #59031] the \[Im] and \[Re] escapes are wrong, Ingo Schwarze, 2020/08/28
- [bug #59031] the \[Im] and \[Re] escapes are wrong, G. Branden Robinson, 2020/08/29
- [bug #59031] the \[Im] and \[Re] escapes are wrong, Ingo Schwarze, 2020/08/29
- [bug #59031] the \[Im] and \[Re] escapes are inadequately described, G. Branden Robinson, 2020/08/29