[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug #61710] [me] $v and $V are in the wrong namespace
From: |
Dave |
Subject: |
[bug #61710] [me] $v and $V are in the wrong namespace |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Jan 2022 11:06:18 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/45.0 |
Follow-up Comment #12, bug #61710 (project groff):
[comment #10 comment #10:]
> I'm not saying the 120% proportionality thing isn't a nice
> feature--it's just that it's a PITA to integrate, maintain, and
> test (nroff and "groff -a" are no help).
That's part of why I asked about retaining $r/$R. Those two registers are
also proportions, and if those are retained, the above considerations still
apply, yes? (Two of them, anyway; $r and $R are already firmly integrated.)
Unless I'm missing something, the testing situation isn't that much different
with the proposed pv and friends: they're still settings to which terminal
output is largely impervious.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?61710>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
- [bug #61710] [me] $v and $V are in the wrong namespace, G. Branden Robinson, 2022/01/05
- [bug #61710] [me] $v and $V are in the wrong namespace, Dave, 2022/01/05
- [bug #61710] [me] $v and $V are in the wrong namespace, Dave, 2022/01/05
- [bug #61710] [me] $v and $V are in the wrong namespace, Dave, 2022/01/05
- [bug #61710] [me] $v and $V are in the wrong namespace, G. Branden Robinson, 2022/01/05
- [bug #61710] [me] $v and $V are in the wrong namespace, G. Branden Robinson, 2022/01/05
- [bug #61710] [me] $v and $V are in the wrong namespace,
Dave <=
- [bug #61710] [me] $v and $V are in the wrong namespace, Dave, 2022/01/09
- [bug #61710] [me] $v and $V are in the wrong namespace, Dave, 2022/01/10
- [bug #61710] [me] $v and $V are in the wrong namespace, G. Branden Robinson, 2022/01/22