[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug #62801] [me] doc/meref.me.in: Clarify a couple points about empty m
From: |
Dave |
Subject: |
[bug #62801] [me] doc/meref.me.in: Clarify a couple points about empty macro arguments |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Aug 2022 23:27:51 -0400 (EDT) |
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #62801 (project groff):
[comment #0 original submission:]
> A few -me macros (... .sh, ....) accept empty arguments, but the
> _me Reference Manual_ doesn't say how to pass an empty argument
> to a roff macro.
More nitpickally, for its string argument T, .sh accepts an empty value (with
undocumented syntax); for its numeric arguments a-f, .sh documents two
different ways to specify no value (hyphen or 0), each of which has a
different meaning.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?62801>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
- [bug #62801] [me] doc/meref.me.in: Clarify a couple points about empty macro arguments,
Dave <=