bug-groff
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug #62801] [me] doc/meref.me.in: Clarify a couple points about empty m


From: Dave
Subject: [bug #62801] [me] doc/meref.me.in: Clarify a couple points about empty macro arguments
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 23:27:51 -0400 (EDT)

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #62801 (project groff):

[comment #0 original submission:]
> A few -me macros (... .sh, ....) accept empty arguments, but the
> _me Reference Manual_ doesn't say how to pass an empty argument
> to a roff macro.

More nitpickally, for its string argument T, .sh accepts an empty value (with
undocumented syntax); for its numeric arguments a-f, .sh documents two
different ways to specify no value (hyphen or 0), each of which has a
different meaning.


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?62801>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]