bug-grub
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re-installing an MBR


From: G.Roderick Singleton
Subject: Re: Re-installing an MBR
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:51:59 GMT

Your procedure for handling grub and ntfs should be added to the 
documentation with a caveat that it may not work. As I dug deeper into my 
RH7.2 it appears that ntfs support is minimal at best. If you like send 
me the documentation sources and I will do the update.

ger

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

On 1/15/02, 11:56:36 AM, "G.Roderick" Singleton 
<address@hidden> wrote regarding Re: Re-installing an MBR:


> I have now reloaded XP and RH7.2 using fat32 on the XP side and etx3(?)
> on RH.
> Works like a charm.

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

> On 1/15/02, 8:58:57 AM, "G.Roderick" Singleton
> <address@hidden> wrote regarding Re: Re-installing an MBR:


> > Hmm. This is even worse than I expected. I trashed my XP MBA so badly I
> > had to reload. I am trying fat to see if that improves things. I'll keep
> > you posted on my experiment.


> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

> > On 1/15/02, 12:37:07 AM, Shaya Potter <address@hidden> wrote regarding
> > Re: Re-installing an MBR:


> > > the way I ended up getting grub and winxp to play nicely was to install
> > > win2k, this takes over the mbr.  I then intstalled linux (debian, doesnt
> > > default to grub), didn't install a bootloader.  booted into linux via
> > > floppy, installed grub to boot record of hda2.  did the dd if=/dev/hda2
> > > of=bootsect.lnx count=1 to get the 512b image.

> > > copied that to a fat partition, in XP copied it to the NTFS partition,
> > > and edited boot.ini appropriatly, and now NTLDR can load grub.

> > > however, I know its possible for grub to boot ntldr, because my laptop
> > > which came with 2k pre installed it works fine.  However, its because of
> > > 1 or 2 seperate things.  on the laptop, the 2k partition is fat32 (the
> > > way it came) and it would appear that IBM installed the bootloader not
> > > in the mbr, but in the boot record of hda1.  so grub is able to install
> > > into the mbr w/o a problem.  I haven't figured out (despite lots of
> > > playing with recovery mode and fixmbr/fixboot commands) how to get the
> > > window boot loader to load into the boot record of the partition
> > > win2k/xp is installed on.

> > > shaya

> > > On Mon, 2002-01-14 at 14:04, Gerry Singleton wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > # For installing GRUB into the hard disk
> > > > > title Install GRUB into the hard disk
> > > > > root    (hd0,0)
> > > > > setup   (hd0)
> > > >
> > > > > This will just (re)install GRUB onto the hard disk.
> > > >
> > > > May I suggest that you add a section that expands upon the above quote.
> > > > I encountered problems in the past 24 hours with having a dual boot
> > > > laptop. I ended up reinstalling XP because GRUB very happily fixed the
> > > > MBR to point only at Linux and didn't pickup XP. However, that is not
> > > > the immediate problem. What is the problem is determining whether or not
> > > > I can use the above command set to re-write the MBR so that it uses my
> > > > new grub.conf with the NT/Windoze incantation or must I re-install
> > > > Linux?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > ger
> > > > --
> > > > ________________________________________________________
> > > > G. Roderick Singleton
> > > > Research Information Systems (RIS)
> > > > University Health Network (PMH(OCI),TWH(TWRI),TGH(TGRI))
> > > > Tel: (416) 340-4820
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Bug-grub mailing list
> > > > address@hidden
> > > > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]