bug-grub
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [grub #67] [PATCH] ISO9660 filesystem support


From: Nino Dehne
Subject: Re: [grub #67] [PATCH] ISO9660 filesystem support
Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 05:59:13 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312

Hello,

pardon my ignorance but is this patch only useful to have GRUB on a CD?

I have the following setup

   Intel Pro/100 S with PXE -> pxegrub
                                       \
           or                           > (nd)/grub/<machine>.conf
                                       /
   Floppy with Etherboot    -> nbgrub
   in VMware/real machine

i.e. a DHCP+TFTP server to hand out nbgrub/pxegrub and the config files based on MAC addresses.

now, for some machines the config file contains

   title local: boot from floppy
   rootnoverify (fd0)
   chainloader +1

which works quite well for booting floppies. Now I was under the impression that, given your patch, I could do something along the lines of

   title local: boot from CD-ROM
   rootnoverify (cd0)
   chainloader +1

or similar (I made up the rootnoverify and chainloader lines). I hope you get the idea. Is this not what your patch does? A quick test indicates that this in fact the case. I recompiled grub, put nbgrub and pxegrub on the tftp server and tried booting. Then I tried 'rootnoverify (' and pressed TAB to see available devices without any indication of a CD-ROM.

I didn't try to install grub on any disk locally, however, but there's another thing coming to mind: is it possible that the iso9660 support is only missing from the netboot files and it would indeed work as i described above if I put grub on a disk locally?

Please cc: as I'm not subscribed

Thanks in advance and regards,

Nino


Disclaimer: I don't get any wiser from looking at the code.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]