[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [grub #67] [PATCH] ISO9660 filesystem support
From: |
Nino Dehne |
Subject: |
Re: [grub #67] [PATCH] ISO9660 filesystem support |
Date: |
Tue, 06 May 2003 05:59:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 |
Hello,
pardon my ignorance but is this patch only useful to have GRUB on a CD?
I have the following setup
Intel Pro/100 S with PXE -> pxegrub
\
or > (nd)/grub/<machine>.conf
/
Floppy with Etherboot -> nbgrub
in VMware/real machine
i.e. a DHCP+TFTP server to hand out nbgrub/pxegrub and the config files
based on MAC addresses.
now, for some machines the config file contains
title local: boot from floppy
rootnoverify (fd0)
chainloader +1
which works quite well for booting floppies. Now I was under the
impression that, given your patch, I could do something along the lines of
title local: boot from CD-ROM
rootnoverify (cd0)
chainloader +1
or similar (I made up the rootnoverify and chainloader lines). I hope
you get the idea. Is this not what your patch does? A quick test
indicates that this in fact the case. I recompiled grub, put nbgrub and
pxegrub on the tftp server and tried booting. Then I tried 'rootnoverify
(' and pressed TAB to see available devices without any indication of a
CD-ROM.
I didn't try to install grub on any disk locally, however, but there's
another thing coming to mind: is it possible that the iso9660 support is
only missing from the netboot files and it would indeed work as i
described above if I put grub on a disk locally?
Please cc: as I'm not subscribed
Thanks in advance and regards,
Nino
Disclaimer: I don't get any wiser from looking at the code.
- Re: [grub #67] [PATCH] ISO9660 filesystem support,
Nino Dehne <=