Re: plan

[cr]

On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 15:05, cr wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 08:23, Marco Gerards wrote:
> > "Yoshinori K. Okuji" <address@hidden> writes:
> > > The consequences will be:
> > > * The CVS module "pupa" will be "grub2" in the GRUB's CVS repository,
> > > * We will use bug-grub instead of pupa-dev for general discussion,
> > > * And, we will set up a web page about GRUB2 in the GRUB's web site.
> >
> > IMHO this is a good thing to do.  This will make it clear to people
> > that PUPA is GRUB and what will happen to GRUB in the future, etc.
> >
> > > I'm not sure if it is a good idea to use bug-grub for GRUB2. What do
> > > you think? Is it better to create another mailing list? I sometimes
> > > feel that bug-grub is used for too many different purposes.
> >
> > Well, I think the biggest problem isn't that PUPA and GRUB are
> > discussed on one mailing list.  The biggest problem is that requests
> > for help are send to bug-grub.
>
> I agree.  I'd like to see a 'grub-help' or a 'grub-user' list to ask GRUB
> questions on.    As it is they feel kinda out of place on Bug-Grub.
>
> cr

But (replying to myself), since the traffic is fairly light, one combined 
list is not a bad idea, as at present.   Maybe, as someone suggested, a more 
'general' name than 'bug-grub' - maybe just 'grub' - would make the list seem 
more 'user-friendly' for useres' questions.

cr