bug-gsl
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gsl] [PATCH] Disable use of FMA


From: Tuomo Keskitalo
Subject: Re: [Bug-gsl] [PATCH] Disable use of FMA
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:03:51 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110921 Thunderbird/3.1.15

Thanks,

that's the initial point in integration. My values there are

-- dstep: 9.81743e-17 3.08687e-48 9.07047e-10 -9.07047e-10 -9.07047e-10 9.07047e-10 -3.62750e-13 -2.20616e-27 -6.93678e-59 -1.81409e-16 -1.81409e-16 1.81409e-16 1.81409e-16 1.57079e-14 4.93899e-46

The differences appear to be related to very small numbers. Can someone make some sense out of this?

On 12/01/2011 08:13 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:

Tuomo Keskitalo<address@hidden>  writes:

What's your architecture/platform, compiler&  version?

gcc 4.6 on G5.

msbdf should never increase or decrease order by more than one, unless it
is reset, so there's something really wrong there. Please post all lines
until previous "msbdf_apply:". Is this coming from test_extreme_problems?

-- msbdf_reset called
msbdf_apply: t=0.00000e+00, ord=1, h=1.00000e-10, y:0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 
0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 
0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 
0.00000e+00
-- ord=1, ni=0, ordwait=2
-- ordprev: 1 1 1 1 1
-- errlev: 1.00000e-07 1.00000e-07 1.00000e-07 1.00000e-07 1.00000e-07 
1.00000e-07 1.00000e-07 1.00000e-07 1.00000e-07 1.00000e-07 1.00000e-07 
1.00000e-07 1.00000e-07 1.00000e-07 1.00000e-07
-- check_no_order_decrease 1, check_step_size_decrease 0
-- calccoeffs ordm1coeff=0.00000e+00 ordp1coeff=2.00000e+00 
ordp2coeff=6.00000e+00 errcoeff=5.00000e-01
-- predicted y: 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 
0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 
0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00
-- evaluate jacobian
-- update M, gamma=1.00000e-10
-- dstep: 9.81743e-17 -8.68549e-36 9.07047e-10 -9.07047e-10 -9.07047e-10 
9.07047e-10 -3.62750e-13 -2.20616e-27 5.60182e-46 -1.81409e-16 -1.81409e-16 
1.81409e-16 1.81409e-16 1.57079e-14 -1.96797e-42

I too bet on a compiler issue.

Definitely not.

Andreas.



--
address@hidden
http://iki.fi/tuomo.keskitalo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]