bug-gsl
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gsl] test release for gsl 1.16


From: Heiko Bauke
Subject: Re: [Bug-gsl] test release for gsl 1.16
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 21:12:18 +0200

Hi,

On Thu, 30 May 2013 11:11:16 -0600
Patrick Alken <address@hidden> wrote:

> I have uploaded a test release for gsl 1.16 here:
> 
> http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/gsl/gsl-1.15.90.tar.gz
> http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/gsl/gsl-1.15.90.tar.gz.sig
> 
> All reports are welcome - anyone who can test on various platforms
> would be appreciated (BSD, Mac OS, Windows).
> 
> Please try testing the build and also the documentation (I upgraded
> the texinfo.tex file in doc/ so I want to make sure that works with 
> everyone's configuration)
> 
> 1) ./configure ; make ; make check
> 2) cd doc ; make ps
> 
> Report any successes/failures to address@hidden
> 
> 

compiling on Ubuntu 12.04 using gcc 4.8 with 

CC=gcc-4.8 CFLAGS="-Wpedantic -Wextra -Wall" ./configure

I get a lot of warnings.  Most of them might be harmless.  Others may
hint to actual errors. For example (plus -Werror)

memcpy.c: In function ‘memcpy’:
memcpy.c:13:19: error: argument ‘len’ doesn’t match built-in prototype
[-Werror] unsigned int len;
                   ^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

Do you think it is (still) a good idea to provide an own memcpy
function coded in K&R C?

»make check« does not detect any errors.


        Heiko


-- 
-- Number Crunch Blog @ http://numbercrunch.de
--  Cluster Computing @ http://www.clustercomputing.de
--        Heiko Bauke @ http://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/personalhomes/bauke





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]