bug-gsl
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gsl] interpo


From: Patrick Alken
Subject: Re: [Bug-gsl] interpo
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2015 14:12:06 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0

Have you verified you're linking against the correct version of GSL?
Your -lgsl might be using the old 1.16 version. If necessary you can
specify the path:

gcc -v -g -Wall -o interp2d interp2d.c /path/to/new/libgsl.a -lgslcblas -lm

On 11/01/2015 11:23 AM, Raymond Rogers wrote:
>
> Below is a script and response files for an extended,/*failed*/, gcc
> execution on my machine Ubuntu 14.04
> For the untrusting (smart ones) here is the script.    Google blocked
> the executable script so I will have to dodge that if anybody wants a
> copy.
>
> ---------------------------
> #!/bin/bash
>
> # The following might have to be changed
> cd /opt/gsl-1.99.90/doc/examples
>
> # Verbose record of compiler in interp2d.lst
> gcc -v -g -Wall -o interp2d interp2d.c -lgsl -lgslcblas -lm
> &>interp2d.lst
> #
> # You will notice that everything looks okay, to me, in
> interp2d_locate.lst
> locate interp2d &> interp2d_locate.lst
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> It's been some time since I debugged gcc output so I just glanced at
> interp2d.lst and found nothing strange.  All of the dates looked okay;
> Oct 31 1015 except for the present .lst files.  If you want a deeper
> look into the file linkages/contents let me know.
>
> Ray
>
> On 10/31/2015 09:56 PM, Patrick Alken wrote:
>> gcc -g -Wall -o interp2d interp2d.c -lgsl -lgslcblas -lm
>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]