bug-gsl
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gsl] [bug #47028] multifit testsuite failure on ppc64le


From: priyanka kaushal
Subject: Re: [Bug-gsl] [bug #47028] multifit testsuite failure on ppc64le
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 18:09:36 +0530

Hi,

I am trying to call function  gsl_cdf_gaussian_P but it gives error:
 *undefined reference to `gsl_cdf_gaussian_P'*

Can i link the gsl libraries without explicitly calling them at compile
time, (gcc gsl_check.cc -L /usr/local/lib -lgsl -lgslcblas -lm -o
gsl_check.o)

all the installation is at default path /usr/local/include/gsl/

How can i call the c program, to which i don't need to call the libraries
explicitly.


Priyanka kaushal
IIT Mandi

On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 6:21 AM, Patrick Alken <address@hidden>
wrote:

> URL:
>   <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?47028>
>
>                  Summary: multifit testsuite failure on ppc64le
>                  Project: GNU Scientific Library
>             Submitted by: psa
>             Submitted on: Sun 31 Jan 2016 12:51:00 AM GMT
>                 Category: Runtime error
>                 Severity: 3 - Normal
>         Operating System:
>                   Status: None
>              Assigned to: None
>              Open/Closed: Open
>                  Release:
>          Discussion Lock: Any
>
>     _______________________________________________________
>
> Details:
>
> from jdemeyer =at= cage =dot= ugent =dot= be
>
> On this system:
>
> Linux sardonis 3.19.0-15-generic #15-Ubuntu SMP Thu Apr 16 23:32:13 UTC
> 2015
> ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux
>
> With this compiler:
>
> gcc (GCC) 4.9.3
> Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
> warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
>
> GSL version 2.1 builds but the testsuite fails. See attachment.
>
> test-suite.log
>
> ======================================
>    gsl 2.1: multifit/test-suite.log
> ======================================
>
> # TOTAL: 1
> # PASS:  0
> # SKIP:  0
> # XFAIL: 0
> # FAIL:  1
> # XPASS: 0
> # ERROR: 0
>
> .. contents:: :depth: 2
>
> FAIL: test
> ==========
>
> FAIL: lmsder/scale=1/wnlin_internal_weights i=0 (5.17378552260920532
> observed
> vs 5.17378551196259195 expected) [190002]
> FAIL: lmsder/scale=1/wnlin_internal_weights i=1 (0.111041758468549051
> observed
> vs 0.111041758006851149 expected) [190003]
> FAIL: lmsder/scale=1/wnlin_internal_weights i=2 (1.05282724317185261
> observed
> vs 1.05282724070446099 expected) [190004]
> FAIL: lmsder/scale=1/weights/wnlin_internal_weights i=0
> (5.17378552260920532
> observed vs 5.17378551196259195 expected) [190007]
> FAIL: lmsder/scale=1/weights/wnlin_internal_weights i=1
> (0.111041758468549051
> observed vs 0.111041758006851149 expected) [190008]
> FAIL: lmsder/scale=1/weights/wnlin_internal_weights i=2
> (1.05282724317185261
> observed vs 1.05282724070446099 expected) [190009]
> FAIL: ridge/lmsder/wnlin_internal_weights i=0 (5.17378552260920532
> observed vs
> 5.17378551196259195 expected) [190022]
> FAIL: ridge/lmsder/wnlin_internal_weights i=1 (0.111041758468549051
> observed
> vs 0.111041758006851149 expected) [190023]
> FAIL: ridge/lmsder/wnlin_internal_weights i=2 (1.05282724317185261
> observed vs
> 1.05282724070446099 expected) [190024]
> FAIL: lmsder/scale=1/wnlin_external_weights i=0 (5.17378552260920532
> observed
> vs 5.17378551196259195 expected) [190042]
> FAIL: lmsder/scale=1/wnlin_external_weights i=1 (0.111041758468549051
> observed
> vs 0.111041758006851149 expected) [190043]
> FAIL: lmsder/scale=1/wnlin_external_weights i=2 (1.05282724317185261
> observed
> vs 1.05282724070446099 expected) [190044]
> FAIL: ridge/lmsder/wnlin_external_weights i=0 (5.17378552260920532
> observed vs
> 5.17378551196259195 expected) [190052]
> FAIL: ridge/lmsder/wnlin_external_weights i=1 (0.111041758468549051
> observed
> vs 0.111041758006851149 expected) [190053]
> FAIL: ridge/lmsder/wnlin_external_weights i=2 (1.05282724317185261
> observed vs
> 1.05282724070446099 expected) [190054]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________________
>
> Reply to this item at:
>
>   <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?47028>
>
> _______________________________________________
>   Message sent via/by Savannah
>   http://savannah.gnu.org/
>
>
>


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]