[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch
From: |
Claes Wallin |
Subject: |
Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:30:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Macintosh/20060516) |
Kevin Ryde wrote:
> Claes Wallin <address@hidden> writes:
>> Demand C99 for math functions.
>
> Which ones are missed otherwise?
From /usr/include/iso/math_c99.h:
#if defined(_STDC_C99) ...
...
#define isinf(x) ...
>
>> +AC_PROG_CC_C99
>
> I'm worried that will turn off good things in gcc. I'd much rather
> leave the compiler in the default mode, or whatever mode the user has
> asked for with CFLAGS.
It seems that isinf is c99, and that earlier gcc:s supported it in isoc
as a GNU extension. If we're using c99, why not specify it? What good
things will be turned off?
/c
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Claes Wallin, 2006/07/19
- Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/07/20
- Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Claes Wallin, 2006/07/20
- Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Claes Wallin, 2006/07/20
- Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Kevin Ryde, 2006/07/20
- Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Claes Wallin, 2006/07/21
- Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Kevin Ryde, 2006/07/23
- Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Claes Wallin, 2006/07/24
- Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Claes Wallin, 2006/07/24
- Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Kevin Ryde, 2006/07/20
- Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch,
Claes Wallin <=
- Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Kevin Ryde, 2006/07/23
- Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Claes Wallin, 2006/07/24
- Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Kevin Ryde, 2006/07/24
- Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Kevin Ryde, 2006/07/20
- Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Kevin Ryde, 2006/07/24
- Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/07/25
Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch, Kevin Ryde, 2006/07/20