Re: (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1

[Hans Aberg]

On 23 May 2011, at 15:49, Andy Wingo wrote:

>>> But, it is 1 and 2, currently.  (+ FOO) inlines just to FOO, too
>>> optimistically.
>> 
>> It is unspecified according to rsr5.
> 
> I know.  I'm talking about Guile here.

The Guile manual, sec. 10.2.5.2, says that SCM_UNSPECIFIED is to be used when 
the Scheme standard says the return is an unspecified value.

So this Lisp extension breaks off from that. If one wants it, perhaps, there 
should be some way to invoke it.

Hans