bug#10991: syntax-local-binding does not play well with fluid-let-syntax

[Stefan Israelsson Tampe]

Ok, I'm not using this at the moment so I can wait for master to become guile-2.2.

I do not know yet why this complexity is needed though (I asked on the racket channel but
could not make anything useful out of the comments) Best to leave it as you suggest.

/Regards
Stefan

On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Andy Wingo <address@hidden> wrote:

Hi Stefan,

Sorry for the late reply.

On Sun 11 Mar 2012 12:47, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <address@hidden> writes:

> ;;This shows that f rebounds to yield #t but the info returns %f
> (eq?
>  (fluid-let-syntax ((f (lambda x #'#t)))
>    (pk (f 1))
>    (info f))
>  %f)

This is by design.  This is as in Racket, where there is a difference
between syntax-local-value and syntax-parameter-value.  In master, there
is an additional parameter to resolve-identifier,
`resolve-syntax-parameters?'.

Suggestion: if you want this, add a similar parameter to psyntax.scm in
stable-2.0, and in both branches plumb it through to a keyword argument
on syntax-local-binding.  Update the docs, too :)  You had the
beginnings of a patch on bug 10992.

Thanks!

Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/