[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#22601: guile.texi section on ice-9 match
From: |
Matt Wette |
Subject: |
bug#22601: guile.texi section on ice-9 match |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Feb 2016 13:04:20 -0800 |
One problem I have with the ref’ manual is the section on (ice-9 match). The
grammar has terms like “string” where I don’t know if this means the literal
term “string” or a string literal. It would be nicer to have a grammar where
the literal term “string” is in code-case and a string literal is described by
“string” in italics. I have worked on rewriting the match match grammar as
@example and as @table.
Does either of these look better to you? See the PDF attached. I am willing
to complete the whole mess in another format, but I need to know which one is
preferred, if any, and someone has to verify that the new grammar specification
is accurate.
Matt
guile_match.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#22601: guile.texi section on ice-9 match,
Matt Wette <=