bug-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#25775: Can't install packages after guix pull


From: Tomas Cech
Subject: bug#25775: Can't install packages after guix pull
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 09:31:06 +0100
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/25.1 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)

On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:30:34 +0100,
Pjotr Prins wrote:
> 
> Yes, using the latest guix-daemon and guix client fixed it:
> 
> /gnu/store/175nlv448nk5kagwwl3zyy2w4726qfz6-guix-0.12.0-4.d9da/bin/guix-daemon
> 
> /home/pjotr/genenetwork/guix/scripts/guix --version
> guix (GNU Guix) 20170218.09
> 
> 
> ./pre-inst-env guix import cpan Time::ParseDate
> 
> Starting download of /tmp/guix-file.hSC5MT
> >From 
> >http://mirror.ibcp.fr/pub/CPAN/authors/id/M/MU/MUIR/modules/Time-ParseDate-2015.103.tar.gz...
>  ...2015.103.tar.gz  26KiB          201KiB/s 00:00 [####################] 
> 100.0%
> (package
>   (name "perl-time-parsedate")
>   (version "2015.103")
>   (source
>     (origin
>       (method url-fetch)
>       (uri (string-append
>              "mirror://cpan/authors/id/M/MU/MUIR/modules/Time-ParseDate-"
>              version
>              ".tar.gz"))
>       (sha256
>         (base32
>           "1lgfr87j4qwqnln0hyyzgik5ixqslzdaksn9m8y824gqbcihc6ic"))))
>   (build-system perl-build-system)
>   (native-inputs
>     `(("perl-extutils-makemaker"
>        ,perl-extutils-makemaker)
>       ("perl-time-piece" ,perl-time-piece)))
>   (home-page
>     "http://search.cpan.org/dist/Time-ParseDate";)
>   (synopsis "Parse and format time values")
>   (description fill-in-yourself!)
>   (license #f))
> 
> I also confirm 'guix pull' failed with the older daemon. Whatever system we
> find to replace 'guix pull' should be more conservative in preventing this 
> type of 
> breakage.


So this means that users of Guix can't make `guix pull' continuously
and will eventually need to use GIT tree?

If so, shouldn't we make new quick release to fill the gap?

Or split release of Guix and guix-daemon? That could be helpful...

S_W





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]