[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content has
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Oct 2017 16:29:07 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) |
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 10:22:33PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Hmm. I'm not sure what problem we are solving. Should we only do this
> for github(-like) tarballs? Do we see this problem with other sources,
> should we prevent it? Possibly github will never do something like this
> again. Or we could banish github/gitlab(?) auto-generated tarballs and
> go for git checkouts+commits?
Files referenced by URL (location-addressing vs content-addressing) have
been changed in place by a variety of hosters and upstream projects
since I've started paying attention to these issues. I don't think we
need to do anything special regarding GitHub.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail, (continued)
- bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail, Maxim Cournoyer, 2017/10/04
- bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail, Leo Famulari, 2017/10/04
- bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail, Maxim Cournoyer, 2017/10/04
- bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail, Maxim Cournoyer, 2017/10/05
- bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2017/10/05
bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/10/02