bug-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#32467: Upgrade of libraw to 0.19 makes krita build fail


From: Björn Höfling
Subject: bug#32467: Upgrade of libraw to 0.19 makes krita build fail
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 18:04:34 +0200

Commit 290532870e3c9ea832e62701ec8784a78d6c6714 updated libraw:

-    (version "0.18.12")
+    (version "0.19.0")

This makes the build of krita fail:

/tmp/guix-build-krita-4.1.1.drv-0/krita-4.1.1/plugins/impex/raw/3rdparty/libkdcr
aw/src/kdcraw_p.cpp: In member function ?bool KDcrawIface::KDcraw::Private::load
FromLibraw(const QString&, QByteArray&, int&, int&, int&)?:
/tmp/guix-build-krita-4.1.1.drv-0/krita-4.1.1/plugins/impex/raw/3rdparty/libkdcr
aw/src/kdcraw_p.cpp:381:32: error: ?struct libraw_output_params_t? has no member
 named ?linenoise?
             raw.imgdata.params.linenoise    = m_parent->m_rawDecodingSettings.N
RThreshold * 2.11E-5 + 0.00111111;
                                ^
/tmp/guix-build-krita-4.1.1.drv-0/krita-4.1.1/plugins/impex/raw/3rdparty/libkdcr
aw/src/kdcraw_p.cpp:382:32: error: ?struct libraw_output_params_t? has no member
 named ?cfaline?
             raw.imgdata.params.cfaline      = true;
                                ^
/tmp/guix-build-krita-4.1.1.drv-0/krita-4.1.1/plugins/impex/raw/3rdparty/libkdcraw/src/kdcraw_p.cpp:389:32:
 error: ?struct libraw_output_params_t? has no member named ?lclean?
             raw.imgdata.params.lclean       = 
m_parent->m_rawDecodingSettings.NRThreshold     * 5E-5;

The problem is already known upstream but not yet solved:

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396121
https://bugs.gentoo.org/659904

Note that this problem is currently hidden by kxmlgui not building:

https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=32013

I fixed #32013 quick and dirty, reverted the libraw-update and then
krita built again.


We should also check the build status of the other dependencies of
libraw as well:

./pre-inst-env  guix refresh -l libraw

Building the following 17 packages would ensure 22 dependent packages are 
rebuilt: address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden 
address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden 
address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden 
address@hidden address@hidden address@hidden


Björn

Attachment: pgpsKQoGxyPD5.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]