[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#39925: `guix pull` failure in multi-machine setup
From: |
Lars-Dominik Braun |
Subject: |
bug#39925: `guix pull` failure in multi-machine setup |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Mar 2020 12:45:48 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
Hi,
> Sounds like this ssh URI is not valid on the nodes, is that right?
I would consider it valid, since `ssh master.<domain>` and `guix build
<package>` both work just fine from the nodes. It’s just `guix pull`, which is
causing issues.
> Right. So perhaps I don’t quite understand the use case. What about
> simply pulling from one of these machines, if everything is shared over
> NFS?
Sure, that’s an option, but anyone who tries will get a strange error message.
And it breaks the appeal of having a remote guix daemon in the first place,
that is being able to run `guix <whatever>` on any machine I log into. If that
is not the case (i.e. not for `guix pull`) it would be more consistent to ask
users to SSH into a different machine every time they interact with guix. Does
that explain my use case?
Lars
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- bug#39925: `guix pull` failure in multi-machine setup, Lars-Dominik Braun, 2020/03/05
- bug#39925: `guix pull` failure in multi-machine setup, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/03/05
- bug#39925: `guix pull` failure in multi-machine setup, Lars-Dominik Braun, 2020/03/06
- bug#39925: `guix pull` failure in multi-machine setup, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/03/06
- bug#39925: `guix pull` failure in multi-machine setup,
Lars-Dominik Braun <=
- bug#39925: `guix pull` failure in multi-machine setup, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/03/08
- bug#39925: `guix pull` failure in multi-machine setup, Lars-Dominik Braun, 2020/03/09
- bug#39925: `guix pull` failure in multi-machine setup, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/03/09
- bug#39925: `guix pull` failure in multi-machine setup, Lars-Dominik Braun, 2020/03/10