bug#40142: (guix cve) discards configuration "vendor", leading to false positives

[Brice Waegeneire]

Hello,

I have thought of a way to improve on those false positives. And I have
submitted a patch to solve the stderr situation at
https://issues.guix.info/issue/40367.

> Probably the fix would be to preserve the vendor part in the API and to
> somehow use it meaningfully

It looks like, for most free software the name of the software is used 
as
 the vendor too, but I'm guessing that's not always the case in 
particular
 when two project are using the same name. So we can't just filter the
 entries where the vendor name isn't the name of the package or we could
 end up with false negatives which seems worse than false positive for a
 vulnerability checker.

One solution would be to display the name of the vendor when it doesn't
correspond to the name of the package. Such solution would still output
false positives but at least it will be quicker to identify then as 
such,
compared to looking up and reading trough each CVE.

- Brice