bug-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#40525: inferior process on core-updates crashes: mmap(PROT_NONE) fai


From: Christopher Baines
Subject: bug#40525: inferior process on core-updates crashes: mmap(PROT_NONE) failed
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 17:53:17 +0100
User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3

Christopher Baines <address@hidden> writes:

> Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Glad you manage to get more info.
>>
>> Christopher Baines <address@hidden> skribis:
>>
>>> Following up on this, I've built Guile on core-updates with libgc@7
>>> rather than libgc@8 (which is what's used above), and I can't reproduce
>>> the issue. So, I'm getting more certain that this is a regression which
>>> the libgc upgrade has led to.
>>
>> Bah.  :-/
>>
>> We noticed similar issues with libgc@8 earlier but it seemed to be
>> fixed:
>>
>>   https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=36812
>>
>>> Would it be feasible to keep guile, or at least the guile Guix uses with
>>> libgc@7 for now?
>>
>> Yes, we can define a Guile variant in (gnu packages guile) and have
>> (guix self) refer to it.
>
> I've sent a patch which I think does this now [1]. Assuming I've done
> the right thing, is this something that can be merged in to core-updates
> Marius?
>
> 1: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=40684
>
> I've tested the patch by running:
>
>   ./pre-inst-env guile build-aux/compile-as-derivation.scm "$PWD"
>
> Then taking the Guix I get, and trying the script to reproduce the issue
> through the guix repl, and it seems to work.

I've merged the fix [1] in now, and it looks to have worked [2].

1: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=40684
2: 
https://guix-patches-data.cbaines.net/revision/cef392f3936922b7b0b74bd59be67e660c10db67

Thanks for your help in resolving this Ludo!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]