Maybe that's premature and we could use etc-service-type in the mean
time.
However, if a kernel-module-configuration-service appeared later then
users
would have to migrate to it manually. Not great.
> kernel-module-configuration-service if/when it exists. (I did not
> know how to extend etc-service-type with a file created at runtime not
> build time, but maybe kernel-module-configuration-service works
> differently anyway.)
I think Brice already had a nice mockup for the design, but I don't
know whether
Brice plans to do it or not. Brice?