bug-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#43746: What to do about packages that don't support --without-tests


From: pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
Subject: bug#43746: What to do about packages that don't support --without-tests / #:tests? #f setting
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 16:31:36 +0200

The new package transformation option --without-tests works by setting
#:tests? #f in the specified packages.  But some packages replace
their 'check phase and no longer honor #tests?.  glib for example.

Attached is an attempt to document this current behavior.  Shall I
push it?  Alternatively, it should be documented to write a check
phase that honors #:tests?.  Or the package transformation should be
changed to remove any check phase it finds.

Regards,
Florian

Attachment: 0001-doc-Explain-why-without-tests-may-fail-with-modified.patch
Description: Text document


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]