[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#43746: What to do about packages that don't support --without-tests
From: |
pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) |
Subject: |
bug#43746: What to do about packages that don't support --without-tests / #:tests? #f setting |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Oct 2020 16:31:36 +0200 |
The new package transformation option --without-tests works by setting
#:tests? #f in the specified packages. But some packages replace
their 'check phase and no longer honor #tests?. glib for example.
Attached is an attempt to document this current behavior. Shall I
push it? Alternatively, it should be documented to write a check
phase that honors #:tests?. Or the package transformation should be
changed to remove any check phase it finds.
Regards,
Florian
0001-doc-Explain-why-without-tests-may-fail-with-modified.patch
Description: Text document
- bug#43746: What to do about packages that don't support --without-tests / #:tests? #f setting,
pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) <=