bug-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#44717: ISO grub config points to nonexistent drive UUID.


From: Jesse Gibbons
Subject: bug#44717: ISO grub config points to nonexistent drive UUID.
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:31:34 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/78.4.0



On 11/18/20 10:17 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi Jesse,

Jesse Gibbons <jgibbons2357@gmail.com> skribis:

For example, if you pick
<https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/guix-system-install-1.2.0rc1.x86_64-linux.iso.xz>,
it boots just fine.  In the GRUB menu entry (type ‘e’ in the menu), you
can see both the DCE UUID for ‘--root’ and the ISO UUID for ‘search.fs’,
which are actually the same.
[...]

guix system disk-image -t iso9660 --root=$(mktemp -p /tmp -d
install.XXX)/install-x86.iso --system=i686-linux
gnu/system/install.scm

and I mounted the ISO itself and took a look at it. The grub.conf
specifies both UUIDs as you described.

When I try it on a VM, it opens a repl with a completely different
error which I'm too lazy to type out by hand. See attached screenshot.
Do you observe the same problem with the image I linked to above?  It’s
built with ‘guix system disk-image -t iso9660 --label=GUIX…
gnu/system/install.scm’.

The error you sent looks as if it’s trying to mount the root file system
read/write.

Thinking about it: does it work if you pass ‘--volatile’ on the
‘disk-image’ command line?  This flag was added recently on ‘master’
(commit 41f27bf8702838f19b1dc5ffee8eec1d4315d4e6), so perhaps what
you’re seeing is a regression here.

Maxim, could it be that we need (volatile-root? #t) for the ISO9660
image type and/or passing ‘--volatile’ in Makefile.am (‘release’ target)
and updating the “Building the Installation Image” node of the manual?

Thanks,
Ludo’.
Passing --volatile to the iso build command fixes the issue with the VM. I'm flashing an the resulting to my external drive right now. In a few hours, I should be able to test if the problem was that the drive didn't fully sync, and hopefully we can close this issue tonight.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]