[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#45497: Feature Request:dm-integrity mapped devices
From: |
raid5atemyhomework |
Subject: |
bug#45497: Feature Request:dm-integrity mapped devices |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Dec 2020 12:29:59 +0000 |
Frankly, MD RAID is incomplete without checksum.
Checksum is provided in Linux by dm-integrity.
Now, LVM2 can actually set up MD RAID with dm-integrity, however:
* It doesn't expose all options.
* It doesn't support specifying an MD journal for RAID4/5/6 to close the
write hole.
In addition, such an MD journal, if placed on a RAID1 of SSDs, can be used
in `writeback` mode to speed up writes to the array.
* It doesn't support dm-integrity without journal.
If you are on RAID4/5/6, the MD journal (if you have one) should also cover
incomplete writes at the integrity-level, thus there should not need to be a
log in integrity level if you have one to cover the write hole at the MD level.
* The LVM-RAID feature is relatively new, compared to `mdadm`-RAID.
More guides and expertise are available on how to recover an `mdadm`-RAID
failure versus an LVM-RAID failure.
Thus, it would be nice to have a dm-integrity device mapper.
However, some complications exist:
* `integritysetup` defaults to tag size (checksum size) of 4 and using crc32c
algorithm.
However, you might prefer a stronger checksum by specifying a larger tag size
and a different checksum algorithm such as "sha256".
While `integritysetup` allows you to format a disk with your preferred
checksum options, it only stores the tag size on the disk.
Whenever you open the disk, ***you have to re-specify the algorithm*** in the
`integritysetup open` command line.
The same also applies to journal mode --- by default it will always open with
full journal.
Thus, I propose:
* Add `arguments` field to `<mapped-device>` record type, default `'()`.
This is a list, typically containing sequential key-value pairs.
This field will be applied to the `open`, `close`, and `check` functions of
the `<mapped-device-kind>` in addition to their existing arguments.
* If the `arguments` list is empty, then existing `<mapped-device-kind>` will
succeed.
* Create an `integritysetup-static` package for use in `initrd`.
* Create a new ``integrity-device-mapping` of type `<mapped-device-kind>`,
which supports the following keywords in the `<mapped-device>` `arguments` list:
* `#:algorithm` - a string (default `"crc32c"`) specifying the integrity
algorithm.
This should be the same as what you specified in the `integritysetup
format` command in the `-I` option.
* `#:journal` - one of the following strings: `"journal"` (default)` to
indicate a full journal at the integrity level, `"bitmap"` to use a faster
"dirty" bitmap, or `"none"` to disable journaling (for example if it already
exists for all data at a higher layer).
Thoughts?
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#45497: Feature Request:dm-integrity mapped devices,
raid5atemyhomework <=