bug#45909: rust@1.47.0, rust-1.48.0 and rust-1.49.0 broken

[Tobias Geerinckx-Rice]

Leo Famulari 写道：
> If anyone is wondering why we didn't notice failures of packages 
> that
> depend on rust, the canonical 'rust' packages is rust-1.45, but 
> these
> failures seem to only affect later versions of rust.

Thanks.  I am reverting the update on master for now.

Kind regards,

T G-R

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature