[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented
From: |
raingloom |
Subject: |
bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Jan 2021 01:34:49 +0100 |
On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 07:10:47 +0100
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> wrote:
> raingloom <raingloom@riseup.net> writes:
>
> > guix archive --authorize started issuing a warning some time ago
> > pointing to "authorized-keys" in "operating-system".
> >
> > * that is not a valid field of operating-system
>
> That’s right. It’s a field of guix-configuration, which is documented
> in 10.8.1 Base Services.
>
Thanks, I found that out already, that's how I ran into the other
issues.
I'm still confused about what the proper way to store the config info
is. Like how I should even store it as Scheme source code.
- bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented, raingloom, 2021/01/15
- bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented, Ricardo Wurmus, 2021/01/16
- bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented,
raingloom <=
- bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/01/20
- bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented, raingloom, 2021/01/23
- bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented, Ricardo Wurmus, 2021/01/23
- bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented, raingloom, 2021/01/25
- bug#45911: authorized-fields is not/badly documented, Ricardo Wurmus, 2021/01/26