bug-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#47164: Cuirass specification complains about missing guix channel wh


From: david larsson
Subject: bug#47164: Cuirass specification complains about missing guix channel when a non-guix channel gets a new commit alone
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:04:38 +0100

On 2021-03-25 14:47, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
Hello David,

      (build '(manifests . ((my-config . "manifests/user1.scm"))))

I have changed the manifest argument format recently. This should now
be:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
  (build '(manifests "manifests/user"))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

      (channels
       (list (channel
              (name 'guix)
              (url "https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git";)
              (branch  "master"))

You should prefer using %default-guix-channel here.

             (channel
              (name 'my-config)
              (url "file:///home/cuirass/my-guixsd-config.sh")
              ;;(url
"https://github.com/methuselah-0/my-guixsd-config.sh.git";)

The problem is that this repository is not really a channel. When
Cuirass tries to build this channel, it tries to build all the scheme
file as if they were module definitions and fails.

This works for me:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(list
 (specification
  (name "my-pkgs")
  (build '(manifests "manifests/user"))
  (channels
   (list %default-guix-channel
         (channel
          (name 'my-config)
          (url "https://gitlab.com/mothacehe/test-channel.git";))
         (channel
          (name 'my-guix-packages)
(url "https://github.com/methuselah-0/my-guix-packages.git";))))))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

where test-channel is a dummy channel repository that contains your
manifest file.  I removed the .scm extension so that Cuirass does not
try to build it, but I this is not an acceptable solution in the long
term.

We would need to find a way to tell Cuirass not to build this channel or
something like that.

Thanks,

Mathieu

Hi,
Thanks. I forked ur test-channel and updated my specs accordingly and it only works the first evaluation, until I push a new commit to the config channel, then Im getting this:

Backtrace:
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
  1736:10 15 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
In unknown file:
          14 (apply-smob/0 #<thunk 7f7b52185ec0>)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
    718:2 13 (call-with-prompt _ _ #<procedure default-prompt-handle?>)
In ice-9/eval.scm:
    619:8 12 (_ #(#(#<directory (guile-user) 7f7b5217ec80>)))
In cuirass/ui.scm:
   104:10 11 (run-cuirass-command _ . _)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
    152:2 10 (with-fluid* _ _ _)
    152:2  9 (with-fluid* _ _ _)
In ice-9/eval.scm:
   293:34  8 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#(#<directory (cuiras?> ?)) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?))
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
  1736:10  7 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
In guix/store.scm:
   636:37  6 (thunk)
In ice-9/eval.scm:
    159:9  5 (_ #(#(#<directory (cuirass scripts evaluate) 7f7?> ?) ?))
   196:35  4 (_ #(#(#<directory (cuirass scripts evaluate) 7f7?> ?) ?))
In guix/channels.scm:
   911:32  3 (channel-instances->derivation _)
   871:36  2 (channel-instances->manifest (#<<channel-instance> cha?>))
    759:6  1 (channel-instance-derivations (#<<channel-instance> ch?>))
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
  1669:16  0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)

ice-9/boot-9.scm:1669:16: In procedure raise-exception:
ERROR:
  1. &message: "'guix' channel is lacking"
2. &fix-hint: "Make sure your list of channels\ncontains one channel named @code{guix} providing the core of Guix." 3. &error-location: #<<location> file: "guix/channels.scm" line: 557 column: 18>



Best regards,
David





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]