bug-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#47480: gprolog: hash mismatch


From: zimoun
Subject: bug#47480: gprolog: hash mismatch
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 19:14:46 +0200

Hi,

Using Guix 55685e4, I get:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix build -S --no-substitutes gprolog
The following derivation will be built:
   /gnu/store/yjrcalnckwmi1ah217xh85sd7ksjcxfw-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz.drv
building /gnu/store/yjrcalnckwmi1ah217xh85sd7ksjcxfw-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz.drv...

Starting download of
/gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz
>From http://gprolog.org/gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz...
downloading from http://gprolog.org/gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz ...
 gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz  3.4MiB        50.1MiB/s 00:00 [##################] 100.0%
sha256 hash mismatch for
/gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz:
  expected hash: 0z4cc42n3k6i35b8mr816iwsvrpxshw6d7dgz6s2h1hy0l7g1p5z
  actual hash:   18mrmx44fll0g1qphadna9g6m7miw8d22lkjavah22vzc38kalyf
hash mismatch for store item
'/gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz'
build of /gnu/store/yjrcalnckwmi1ah217xh85sd7ksjcxfw-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz.drv
failed
View build log at
'/var/log/guix/drvs/yj/rcalnckwmi1ah217xh85sd7ksjcxfw-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz.drv.bz2'.
guix build: error: build of
`/gnu/store/yjrcalnckwmi1ah217xh85sd7ksjcxfw-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz.drv'
failed

$ guix build -S gprolog
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
3.6 MB will be downloaded:
   /gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz
substituting /gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz...
downloading from
https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz
...
 gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz  3.4MiB         5.9MiB/s 00:01 [##################] 100.0%

/gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

It is probably an upstream in-place replacement.  This kind of thing is
really annoying because it means that people using substitutes do not
notice whereas people building from source do.


All the best,
simon





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]