[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible"
From: |
Mark H Weaver |
Subject: |
bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible" |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Apr 2021 13:23:51 -0400 |
Hi Ludovic,
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
> What could have been nice is if there’s a way to mark specific strings
> as being ASCII, or if there’s a “byte vector” data type compatible with
> strings, for instance.
Do we know that all strings containing store references will be
representable in ASCII?
Mark
- bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible", (continued)
- bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible", Mark H Weaver, 2021/04/06
- bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible", Ludovic Courtès, 2021/04/08
- bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible", Mark H Weaver, 2021/04/13
- bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible", Ludovic Courtès, 2021/04/14
- bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible", Leo Famulari, 2021/04/14
- bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible", Mark H Weaver, 2021/04/15
- bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible", Pierre Neidhardt, 2021/04/16
bug#33848: Store references in SBCL-compiled code are "invisible",
Mark H Weaver <=