bug-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#40525: inferior process on core-updates crashes: mmap(PROT_NONE) fai


From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: bug#40525: inferior process on core-updates crashes: mmap(PROT_NONE) failed
Date: Sat, 08 May 2021 11:56:03 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)

Hi,

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:

> Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> skribis:
>
>> Following up on this, I've built Guile on core-updates with libgc@7
>> rather than libgc@8 (which is what's used above), and I can't reproduce
>> the issue. So, I'm getting more certain that this is a regression which
>> the libgc upgrade has led to.
>
> Bah.  :-/
>
> We noticed similar issues with libgc@8 earlier but it seemed to be
> fixed:
>
>   https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=36812
>
>> Would it be feasible to keep guile, or at least the guile Guix uses with
>> libgc@7 for now?
>
> Yes, we can define a Guile variant in (gnu packages guile) and have
> (guix self) refer to it.

FWIW flatwhatson reported the dreaded libgc “mmap(PROT_NONE)” crash
upstream and gathered more info:

  https://github.com/ivmai/bdwgc/issues/353

On #guile they also mentioned that libgc 8 defaults to
‘--enable-munmap=6’ whereas libgc 7 would default to ‘--disable-munmap’.

Thus, in ‘core-updates’ commit a605ef3ce9dbd6b79dd9322f89d9facaf875b487,
I changed libgc 8 so it’s built with ‘--disable-munmap’.  This relieves
the need for ‘guile-3.0/libgc-7’.  (I checked with “make as-derivation”
on x86_64-linux that those derivations that would previously fail with
libgc 8 no longer do.)

Ludo’.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]