bug#48974: A possible shepherd bug (it's very minor)

[Leo Prikler]

Hi,

Am Freitag, den 25.06.2021, 05:31 -0400 schrieb Joshua Branson:
> Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> writes:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Am Samstag, den 12.06.2021, 20:09 +0000 schrieb jbranso@dismail.de:
> > > June 12, 2021 3:39 PM, "Leo Prikler" <
> > > leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at>
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Am Samstag, den 12.06.2021, 09:26 -0400 schrieb Joshua Branson:
> > > > 
> > > > > Hello!
> > > > > 
> > > I'll tell you what, why don't we leave this "bug" open for a
> > > week...I'll try to write
> > > the code that does what I want, and I'll email the answer.
> > > 
> > > Then I'll edit the manual to provide an example!
> > I'm pretty sure that the actual bug also exists, just not sure
> > whether
> > that's on your config or on shepherd.  Using TTY1 for graphical
> > stuff
> > is also somewhat rare in Guix land, I presume.  (Or rather, I can't
> > think of it as anything but a container for debug output spam :D)
> > 
> > As for getting this to work only on TTY1, you do get the config
> > object,
> > so you can do stuff like
> >   (if (is-tty1? config) (inherit+autologin config) config)
> > Note of course, that is-tty1? is not a procedure that's ready-made, 
> > but
> > one that you'd need to build from primitives such as record
> > accessors.
> > 
> 
> Well, it's been about a week. Here is my current code that doesn't
> work.
> haha.
> 
> #+BEGIN_SRC scheme
> (define %my-desktop-services
>   (modify-services %desktop-services ;;end of remove services
>     (mingetty-service-type config =>
>                            (mingetty-configuration
>                             (inherit config)
>                             ;; ERROR at the NEXT LINE
>                             (auto-login-to-tty-3 config)
>                             ))))
> 
> (define (auto-login-to-tty-3 config)
>   (if (string=? "3" (mingetty-configuration-tty config))
>       '(auto-login "joshua")
>       '(auto-login #f)))
> #+END_SRC
> 
> It obviously doesn't work because I am treating modify-services as if
> it were a procedure.  In fact, it is a macro.  :)
That's not the issue here, the issue is that you're treating mingetty-
configuration as… I'm not really sure what exactly, when it is in fact
a record constructor.  

Try the following:
#+BEGIN_SRC scheme
(define (auto-login-to-tty tty user)
  ;; TODO: you might want to implement this as match-lambda instead
  (lambda (config)
    (if (string=? tty (mingetty-configuration-tty mingetty-config))
        (mingetty-configuration
          (inherit config)
          (auto-login user))
        config)))

(define %my-desktop-services
  (modify-services %desktop-services
   
(mingetty-service-type config => 
                          (auto-login-
to-tty "3" "joshua"))))
#+END_SRC


> #+BEGIN_SRC scheme
> (define (auto-login-to-tty-3 mingetty-service)
>   (if (string=? "3" (mingetty-configuration-tty config))
>       '(mingetty-configuration
>          (auto-login "joshua")
>          (tty "3"))
>       mingetty-service))
Don't quote mingetty-configuration et al.  They're first-class syntax,
not just weird lists.

> (define (my-modify-%desktop-services-to-auto-login-on-tty-3 %desktop-
> services)
>    ;; to be written
>    ;; though I think fold, or map, may be useful functions here.
> 
>    ;;somehow I will use this function...
>     (auto-login-to-tty-3 mingetty-service)
> )
> 
> (define %my-desktop-services
>         (my-modify-%desktop-services-to-auto-login-on-tty-3 %desktop-
> services))
I don't think you need to implement modify-services on your own, rather
just use the existing thing in the "correct" way – i.e. adhering to the
expectations given by the already existing procedure (or macro).
> #+END_SRC
Regards,
Leo